Friday, August 15, 2014
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Re-enactment Craft Groups on Facebook.
For you textile geeks and sewers out there who regularly use Facebook, I want to share this listing of groups dedicated to recreating various crafts (mostly clothing focused). I am quite sure there are a number of groups out there that I have missed. Links do not open in a new window.
UPDATED: 4-14-15
UPDATED: 5-24-16
~~~Clothing groups, Specific Cultures.
UPDATED: 4-14-15
UPDATED: 5-24-16
~~~Clothing groups, Specific Cultures.
Warning: A Ramble on Perfection in craftsmanship.
Going
to ramble a bit…and it is a ramble, just so you are warned.
Something I ran across
today (not sure where) is this article (have you read it? Good...now you can continue the paragraphs below. Read this one too, if you haven't before.), which talks about the difference between the real idea of handmade
(where every possible detail is attended to with the utmost discipline) and the
modern (and this article was written in ’59) idea of handmade (which is that it
is full of flaws). The keyword here is
discipline—not settling for anything less than perfection in every step,
starting with the base product for the craft; in the fit of the product to that exact customer. Thinking about this, I
believe it started with Beau Brummel, and his beginnings of focusing on the
exacting details of his clothing. When
the gentleman shows his quality by the extremely finicky details of his
possessions, and not settling for less, it rolls down to the craftsman (who has to figure out how to obtain the results), and the
levels of apprentices; and thus, with every generation, the knowledge base of
the details grows. This is even still
happening, with the finest bespoke tailors, who have a tradition of perfection; I believe that the majority of the
knowledge has not been lost. It is just inaccessible to everybody unable to take a traditional seven year
apprenticeship, probably in foreign countries.
Thursday, July 31, 2014
Research Dump the First
It was pointed out to my (by my own brain, no less) that it would probably be an excellent idea to share the assorted links I find on my researches here, as well as on my personal and Linkspage pages on the Book of Face--just so they do not get lost, as they have been. So, every so often (when I've actually been doing serious research), I will gather the links up and dump them in a post here. For those who are not familiar with my habits, I often share the abstract and/or a personal synopsis of the article, and sometimes my opinion on its contents--it is not a bibliography (annotated or not), since I typically come across and post things which may (or may not) be in the same culture...but that about it.
This is the first, probably of many (hopefully, I will go back through my Linkspage and dig up many of the publications from there), and contains Norse related stuff (axes and jewelry, it seems), and 16th Century Persian clothing (at least, that is what I was searching for).
Enjoy.
This is the first, probably of many (hopefully, I will go back through my Linkspage and dig up many of the publications from there), and contains Norse related stuff (axes and jewelry, it seems), and 16th Century Persian clothing (at least, that is what I was searching for).
Enjoy.
Sunday, June 22, 2014
G63 Coat Reconstruction
Rough Description:
Construction:
Goals:
This
piece is based on one found in Herjolfnes, Greenland ,
as part of the Viking settlement from the 14th century. It is a knee length, loose, coat like garment
with set in armscyles and a short collar.
Construction:
The
main body is made of eight trapezoidal pieces, four in front and four in the
back, with a front buttoned down to the waist (conjecture). The original garment had buttons about every
½ inch, and probably 30-40 originally[1]. The sleeves were made of four pieces, consisting
of a funky shaped upper arm with a gusset in the back, and a lower sleeve with
an elbow gusset; the sleeves are only about arm length (not much, if any extra
length) with a deeply curved armscyle.
Seams, decoration, and fabric:
The
back seam is 1.08% longer than the front seam and seems to have been decorated
with a backstitch. The seams also lay
towards the back. The garment is
constructed in such a way that each of the eight pieces has a straight and a
bias edge, and all of the seams are constructed with straight-to-bias, limiting
stretch. It also seems to have been
decorated and re-enforced along all the seams with stab stitching.
The
fabric used in the original was a 2/2 wool twill, originally very dark
brown. The garment is believed to have
been trimmed around the neck and down the front opening (on the left side with
the buttonholes) with a thin material woven in 2/1 twill, originally madder
colored. There are also traces of tablet
woven edging on a piece believed to have been the bottom hem. The thread used for the stitching was likely
finely spun wool or goat hair.
Goals:
My
goals in making this garment are to make a working garment based on the
original, as close to the original in patterning as possible (while still
making a garment that fits me and my sense of aesthetics) and learn about seam
and finishing techniques of the period.
Thursday, June 19, 2014
16th Century Irish Dress
I feel that claims that Irish clothing
changed very little over time are completely false. A 4th century Irishman did not
wear the same thing as 10th, who didn’t wear the same as 14th,
which certainly wasn’t the same as the 16th—which is what I will
cover in this article.
There
are common elements throughout—such as the leine
gel, the white or saffron dyed linen shirt; the wearing of the Irish Brat,
or large, fringed, cloak—a garment which seems to have been truly omnipresent[1];
and the predilection to wearing tight, or no pants. In addition to the Irish styles of dress,
English and Continental fashions were also slowly adopted (often with the
addition of the brat), and were more prevalent in major cities (particularly
port cities), among the upper class, and later in the century.
Throughout
this period the English rulers (Henry VIII…) attempted to enforce freshly
created laws forbidding Irish modes of fashion, and haircuts—this is one of our
prime sources on the essentials of Irish clothing. Articles targeted were the glib hairstyle,
women’s headwear, the dying with saffron, the
amount of cloth used in the leine, and ,particularly, the Irish Mantle
(with its fringe).
Men’s
Clothing
Leine: This (in various forms), along with the brat,
was one of the two main articles of Irish dress throughout the ages. The leine was invariably made of linen,
likely a heavier weight, tightly woven type than is commonly available
today. The colour by this time was almost
invariably saffron dyed yellow (a bright yellow)--or natural for the destitute.
The leine was usually long—ankle
length—and bloused over the belt in order to pull it up to knee level and allow
greater freedom of movement. Necklines
seem to have been roughly ‘V’ shaped and often fairly deep. I believe that they were probably rounded in
the back, making the neck opening a loose teardrop shape when laid out flat
during construction.
The sleeves of the leine were very
wide at the cuff, often hanging to the knee—but were narrow at the top[i]. An interesting evolution on these is that
though the sleeve itself is very wide at the cuff—they were not necessarily
very long. Several images show the
sleeve stopping just below the elbow, presumably to give greater freedom of
movement and reduce the chance of entanglement I believe that at least occasionally
the sleeves were full length, and in the “bagpipe sleeve” style.
Monday, June 16, 2014
Pluderhosen: Some assembly required
| Pattern Traced from Patterns of Fashion, by Janet Arnold. |
Continuing on from my last post--A Road To Madness--I believe I managed to rectify my mistake, by extending the dart into a seam going the full width of the piece. This will result in the back panel being slightly shorter (around 1/2 inch, since I'm using as small of a seam allowance as I may), but that should be acceptable---that piece 1/2 inch shorter than it should, should not be noticeable.
| Here, you can see the modified dart (left) and the original plan (right). |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

