![]() |
| After a day of wear at 3-Barons Renfair. I got a number of compliments on them! |
Saturday, June 18, 2016
The Dungiven Project: Part Shoe!
The Dungiven Project is my journey to attempt to recreate--to the best of my resources and abilities--the outfit from the Dungiven find; primarily a doublet, trius, pair of shoes, and a brat. There were a couple of other fragments--including a belt--but they are not quite as important.
Thursday, June 16, 2016
End of the Road, Finished Pluderhose
So, this is something unusual for me--this project isn't based on any one particular object...normally, my serious projects are duplicating one object or another (or I don't care). However, this one was primarily testing my new system for drafting pluderhose, based on the Erik and Nils Sture examples, as part of making a period (1570s) suit. So--a pair of 1570s German Pluderhose.
Pluderhose: Putting it all Together
Things have gotten a bit wonky, since drafting the poofs is part of this post, but that is getting done before I have drafted the codpiece (which is done after the majority of construction is finished).
Revenge of the Pluderhose: the Codpiece of DOOOM!
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
The HSM 2016: Challenge No. 6: Travel
For the June Historical Sew Monthly Challenge (Due the last day of the month. Ish.), the subject of "Travel" was chosen; Make a garment for travel, or inspired by traveling. The original idea stated "Clothes and accessories worn or useful during travel, on foot, riding, in a carriage, on a ship.”. A rather broad, and possibly tricky theme. Throughout history--more in some periods than others--special clothing or accessories might have been used for traveling, by carriage (or automobile), boat, foot, or horse; a number of these items could overlap with the Protection Challenge (March). You might also get ideas from The Great Outdoors challenge of 2014.
Monday, May 2, 2016
1880s Dress-Improver: HSM #4
The April Challenge for the Historical Sew Monthly was a real challenge....to figure out what to do. See, the challenge is Gender-Bender; Make an historical clothing item which is either for the opposite sex, or has elements inspired by the opposite gender.
As a guy, the second option is almost out--you don't see historical menswear inspired by lady's fashion. My first choice was men's stays, based on a late Regency pair which is essentially a back brace, complete with spring elastic (made of....springs); unfortunately, this had to be discarded due to issues sourcing good quality boning of the right width (I would still like to make it someday, though). Other options that came to mind was the Skjoldehamn find, which we don't know gender of (using Schrodinger's Authenticity to slip it in, as it was remarked by one person I asked). Other thoughts I had were possibly a pair of boots or shoes with heels (I have seen it stated that heels started as a male fashion, and as a female one), or a coat from the 1820-40s, as male and female fashions at the time sorta mirrored each other (wide shoulders, narrow waist, wide/full skirts); both those these would have required a fair amount of research, and some arguing--not against doing so, but I ran out of time.
As a guy, the second option is almost out--you don't see historical menswear inspired by lady's fashion. My first choice was men's stays, based on a late Regency pair which is essentially a back brace, complete with spring elastic (made of....springs); unfortunately, this had to be discarded due to issues sourcing good quality boning of the right width (I would still like to make it someday, though). Other options that came to mind was the Skjoldehamn find, which we don't know gender of (using Schrodinger's Authenticity to slip it in, as it was remarked by one person I asked). Other thoughts I had were possibly a pair of boots or shoes with heels (I have seen it stated that heels started as a male fashion, and as a female one), or a coat from the 1820-40s, as male and female fashions at the time sorta mirrored each other (wide shoulders, narrow waist, wide/full skirts); both those these would have required a fair amount of research, and some arguing--not against doing so, but I ran out of time.
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
Revenge of the Pluderhose: The Panes of Torment
I'm kinda seeing a trend in how I feel about the garment, here *looks pointedly at the title*.
This, the second of the series of posts on the making of /period/ pluderhose, deals with the panes and lining....originally, I was going to include the codpiece in this post, but I suspect that it wouldn't be a bad idea for it to get its own post. I will not (yet) be showing how to do the lining--that is, the poofs; that particular set of images will wait until I actually begin construction of the garment--they are not exactly complicated, and use a lot of fabric.
Now, if you are reading this, I hope you've been following along and already have drafted the foundation breeches from PART I. If you have not, you should go there and make them forthwith, because you build the panes from the foundation breech pattern you've already fitted. Strictly speaking, the foundation breeches aren't 100% necessary--the Svante Sture pair doesn't seem to have them, and longer pairs may not have them; so if you are doing without, you will more or less follow the directions there, ignoring the taper of the legs.
If you are doing this correctly (ish, being as there is no true way) there is little shaping of the panes, and what there is follows the foundation breeches; what this means, is that we will be cutting from the panes to give some of the shapes.. However, the pane length is at least 15% more than that of the foundation breeches--I made them closer to 30%--, to allow the draping. Like the foundation breeches, I am basing it on Erik and Nils Sture's pluderhose.
At some point before beginning, you should decide how many panes you desire--I have seen examples that (appear to) have anywhere from Four to Seven. Five appears to be the most popular number, however. More panes would, of course, require more fabric in the lining since you will have more sections .
This, the second of the series of posts on the making of /period/ pluderhose, deals with the panes and lining....originally, I was going to include the codpiece in this post, but I suspect that it wouldn't be a bad idea for it to get its own post. I will not (yet) be showing how to do the lining--that is, the poofs; that particular set of images will wait until I actually begin construction of the garment--they are not exactly complicated, and use a lot of fabric.
Now, if you are reading this, I hope you've been following along and already have drafted the foundation breeches from PART I. If you have not, you should go there and make them forthwith, because you build the panes from the foundation breech pattern you've already fitted. Strictly speaking, the foundation breeches aren't 100% necessary--the Svante Sture pair doesn't seem to have them, and longer pairs may not have them; so if you are doing without, you will more or less follow the directions there, ignoring the taper of the legs.
If you are doing this correctly (ish, being as there is no true way) there is little shaping of the panes, and what there is follows the foundation breeches; what this means, is that we will be cutting from the panes to give some of the shapes.. However, the pane length is at least 15% more than that of the foundation breeches--I made them closer to 30%--, to allow the draping. Like the foundation breeches, I am basing it on Erik and Nils Sture's pluderhose.
At some point before beginning, you should decide how many panes you desire--I have seen examples that (appear to) have anywhere from Four to Seven. Five appears to be the most popular number, however. More panes would, of course, require more fabric in the lining since you will have more sections .
![]() |
| Seven Panes! |
![]() |
Lucas Cranach the younger, 1563. Four Panes |
![]() |
| Brunswick Man. 1573. Five panes. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





